Google Ads Expert in Nepal

On the call, from the account itself. I will screen-share Google Ads showing spend, conversions and cost per conversion on real accounts, which is more useful than a figure on a page anyway because you can ask what drove it. What you will not find published here is a client's results or a client's name — those are theirs. A marketer willing to publish one client's numbers is telling you what they will do with yours.

Concretely: running a server-side tagging server instead of browser-only tags, writing Google Ads Scripts in JavaScript for bid rules and broken-URL checks, and building offline conversion import so closed-won deals from the CRM are uploaded back into the account. Those three capabilities change what the bidding algorithm is trained on. Without them, an account optimizes toward form fills and calls it revenue.

No. There is no reliable per-industry CPC benchmark for Nepal that can be published honestly here, and the ad spend behind this practice was managed largely outside Nepal. The workable alternative is to pull your own numbers from Keyword Planner for your exact keywords and geography, then treat the first few weeks of your own account data as the benchmark. Anyone quoting a precise Nepali CPC table should be asked for their sample size.

The Google click ID is captured in a hidden form field at submission and posted to the CRM alongside the lead. It stays on the record as the deal moves through the pipeline. When the deal is marked closed-won, the click ID, conversion time, and deal value are uploaded back to Google Ads as an offline conversion, which lets Smart Bidding optimize toward customers instead of form fills.

Both, plus Demand Gen, chosen by what the account needs rather than by preference. Performance Max is workable when conversion data is clean and values are real, because it is only as good as the signal it is given. On an account with broken tracking it becomes a black box spending money against a metric nobody trusts, which is why the tracking rebuild always comes first.

No. Auction dynamics, competitor budgets, seasonality, and your own sales follow-up all move the outcome, and none of them are fully controllable from inside the ad account. What is committed to is the method: verified tracking, documented bid governance, value-based bidding once real deal values exist, and reporting reconciled against the CRM. Guaranteed numbers in paid search are a sales device, not a forecast.

Yes, and it is a common starting point. The first phase is a tracking audit rather than a strategy change, because inherited accounts frequently carry duplicate conversion actions, conversions counting page views, or imported analytics events double-counting the same purchase. Restructuring campaigns on top of misleading data just produces confident decisions built on the wrong inputs.

Only in the sense of pointing at how the account is structured. Payment routes, card limits, and foreign-exchange rules are matters for your own bank and a Nepali chartered accountant, and specific arrangements should be confirmed with them rather than taken from a marketing page. In most engagements the client holds the payment instrument and is the advertiser of record on their own account.